Call: 360-866-7393

Grandparents’ Visitation Rights in Washington State

Home / Divorce Blog / Grandparents’ Visitation Rights in Washington State


The Washington State Legislature has passed a second attempt to legislatively grant Grandparents the right to seek Court ordered visitation with their Grandchildren, SB 5598, now codified as RCW 26.11.010 – 060, Nonparental Child Visitation – Relatives.  This has created a clearer picture for grandparents’ visitation rights in Washington.


The Legislature’s first attempt to clarify grandparents’ visitation rights was struck down years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Troxel v. Granville. The Supreme Court found the Washington State law, RCW 26.09.240, to be too broad. They ruled that the parent’s fundamental right to control the care and custody of their children was protected by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. By granting “any person” the right to seek Court ordered visitation with “any child” the original Washington State statute violated the parents’ Right of Due Process. The Legislature repealed RCW 26.09.240 at the same time they passed SB 5598 this year.


The entirely new RCW 26.11.010-060 is much more specific and detailed as to who is allowed to petition for visitation with a child, and the burden of proof required to be successful with the Court. By defining and narrowing the persons allowed to petition for visitation, and imposing strict requirements, the Legislature is trying to satisfy the US Supreme Court’s criticism and fix the overly broad RCW26.09.240.


Only a person defined as a “Relative” in RCW 26.11.010 can Petition the Court for visitation. Relatives are defined to include:
(1) Any blood or half-blood relative including first and second cousins;
(2) Stepfather, stepmother, stepbrothers, stepsisters;
(3) Any person who legally adopted a child or the child’s parents, and relatives of the adoptive parent;
(4) Spouses of above-named persons, even if the marriage has been terminated;
(5) Relatives of any half sibling;
(6) Extended family members as defines by law or custom of an Indian child’s tribe.


A Petition for Nonparental Child Visitation may be filed if the Petitioner is a defined Relative of the child, has an ongoing substantial relationship with the child for at least two years (or at least half of the life of a child under two years of age), and that the child is likely to suffer harm or substantial risk of harm if the petition is denied. A petition may be filed only one time by any person.


The new law actually declares a “Presumption” in favor of a fit parent who is opposing the Petition for Nonparental Child Visitation. To prevail on the petition, the Nonparental Petitioner must overcome this legal presumption in opposition to the petition by “Clear and Convincing” evidence that the Petition is in the best interest of the child. In other words, the relative must make a very convincing argument that there is good reason for the Court to grant visitation over the objections of the parent This is an extremely high and difficult burden of proof.


When reviewing the Petition, the Court must consider 12 factors set forth in the new law, and rule that the Petitioner has proven each of these factors by Clear and Convincing evidence. After reviewing the Petition the Court may either deny the Petition outright, or if the Court determines that the Petitioner has met their burden of proof, the Court will order a Hearing where the parties will present testimony. If a Hearing is granted, the opposing parent may request that the Nonparental petitioner be ordered to pay all of the parent’s attorney fees and cost in advance of the Hearing.


The Legislature is attempting to create an opportunity for Nonparental persons to seek visitation with a child that they love, while protecting the constitutional rights of an opposing parent. The opportunity has been created, but success for the Petitioner relative will be difficult to achieve.


You can view the state RCWs related to this topic by clicking here

Real People, Real Results

Divorce Lawyers for Men Reviews

"I never thought my wife would agree to anything. After a few discussions though, we were able to agree on a lot of issues concerning the children. Divorce Lawyers for Men helped me put those agreements in writing and resolve my divorce with less conflict."

"Divorce Lawyers for Men was very helpful with my case. The staff and attorneys are very knowledgeable and provided great advice. They provided me understanding of various courses of action and brought to light specific things I wouldn't have thought of. Most importantly respected my decisions and beliefs in finalizing my case."

"My wife wanted to live in our house with her new boyfriend while I kept paying the mortgage. Divorce Lawyers for Men made sure the court saw all our property and debts. We sold the house and split the proceeds. I didn't have to pay for any free rides."

"I never wanted to get divorced. One day my wife came home and said that she had met someone else. Why do I have to lose my house and my children just because she is done with our marriage? Thankfully, I hired Divorce Lawyers for Men."

Washington's Only Statewide Family Law Network

Select an Office near You.

1520 140th Ave NE #200
Bellevue, WA 98005
2727 Oakes Ave #201
Everett, WA 98201
555 W Smith Street, Suite 106
Kent, WA 98032
3025 Limited Ln NW #200
Olympia, WA 98502
Port Orchard
1740 Pottery Ave #300
Port Orchard, WA 98366
2102 E Main Ave #203
Puyallup, WA 98372
701 5th Ave #4200
Seattle, WA 98101
1008 N. Washington St., Second Floor
Spokane, WA 99201
1015 Pacific Avenue #301
Tacoma, WA 98402
237 NE Chkalov Dr #212
Vancouver, WA 98684